Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 15 No. 1 (2017)

Canada versus the World: The Validity and Usefulness of Ranking Healthcare Systems by Country

January 1, 2017


Various organizations have attempted to formally evaluate and compare the performance of national healthcare systems. In this commentary, I argue that fundamental methodological issues annul many of their conclusions, and question the usefulness and implications of such rankings, before suggesting possible alternatives.


  1. Deber R. Healthcare Quarterly [Internet]. Why Did the World Health Organization Rate Canada's Health System as 30th? Some Thoughts on League Tables :: [cited 2017Jan1]. Available from:
  2. The world health report 2000 - Health systems: improving performance [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; [cited 2017Jan1]. Available from:
  3. Davis K, Stremikis K, Squires D, Schoen C. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally [Internet]. The Commonwealth Fund. [cited 2017Jan1]. Available from:
  4. Du L, Lu W. U.S. Health-Care System Ranks as One of the Least-Efficient [Internet]. Bloomberg; 2016 [cited 2017Jan1]. Available from:
  5. Musgrove P. Judging health systems: reflections on WHO's methods. The Lancet. 2003;361(9371):1817–20.
  6. Almeida C, Braveman P, Gold MR, Szwarcwald CL, Ribeiro JM, Miglionico A, et al. Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. The Lancet. 2001;357(9269):1692–7.
  7. Navarro V. Assessment of the World Health Report 2000. The Lancet. 2000;356(9241):1598–601.
  8. Murray CJ, Frenk J. Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(2):98–9.
  9. Murray C, Frenk J. Authors reply to: Musgrove P. Health care system rankings. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1546-7; author reply 1547. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1001849.
  10. Canada Health Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-6) [Internet]. Legislative Services Branch. 2016 [cited 2017Jan1]. Available from:
  11. Navarro V. The World Health Report 2000: Can Health Care Systems Be Compared Using a Single Measure of Performance? American Journal of Public Health. 2002;92(1):31–4.
  12. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2005;10(suppl 1):21–34.
  13. Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2006Aug;6(1).


Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.