Perceived Risk of Pesticide Exposure Among School Workers in San Carlos, Costa Rica
Published 2025-06-01
Keywords
- pesticide exposure,
- Costa Rica,
- perception of risk,
- school worker,
- reduction of risk
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Alison Stacey, Douglas Barraza, Paniz Bolourchi ; Christopher Acuña-Quesada

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Background: There is increasing literature examining the effect of pesticides on people in proximity to pesticide use. However, limited information exists on how bystanders perceive the risk of pesticides to their health. This study aims to explore how school workers perceive the exposure to pesticides in a region where agriculture is the dominant economic driving force, and how these perceptions vary by sociodemographic subgroup.
Methods: A total of 143 school workers from five districts in the San Carlos region of Costa Rica responded to the Technical Prevention Notes (NTP-578) perceived risk survey. The Mann-Whitney U test along with a Bonferroni control determined the statistical significance between subgroups. The four main sections for analysis of the results were prior knowledge on pesticide-related risks, perception of control over pesticide exposure, perception of current health risk and general knowledge of pesticide exposure.
Results: Statistically significant differences in perceptions were seen by location, sex, age, level of education and position. Males and teachers exhibited higher levels of prior knowledge of hazards, whereas the older population, people without a university degree and administrators had higher perception of control over exposure to pesticides.
Conclusion: School workers are knowledgeable on exposure to workplace pesticides and are aware of the severity of risk associated with pesticide exposure. In line with results from other studies, the older population and university educated people had higher perceived control over mitigating affects of pesticides. Our findings suggest that school workers could play a vital role in increasing knowledge dissemination pathways on pesticide-related harms. Further research could help in transforming school workers and bystanders into stakeholders and advocates for buffer zones.
Downloads
References
- Alvarado AG. Sustainable pineapple production in Costa Rica. Esri; 2021. Available from: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/2c3b2463594e48c88b143e14b8d1b025
- Canapep. Exportación de piña en 2023 (Pineapple exports in 2023). Available from: https://canapep.com/estadisticas/
- Del Moral-Arroyo M. 20 años buscando la excelencia en la producción de piña de Costa Rica (20 years searching for excellence in Costa Rican pineapple production). Available from: https://www.freshplaza.es/article/9534858/20-anos-buscando-la-excelencia-en-la-produccion-de-pina-de-costa-rica/
- Willer H, Lernoud J, editors. The world of organic agriculture: Statistics & emerging trends 2017. Frick and Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM - Organics International; 2017.
- Jiménez K, Solano K, Scholz C, Redondo-López S, Mena F. Early toxic effects in a Central American native fish (Parachromis dovii) exposed to chlorpyrifos and difenoconazole. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(7):1940–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5048
- Valverde BE, Chaves L. The banning of bromacil in Costa Rica. Weed Sci. 2020;68(3):240–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.13
- Shrestha S, Kamel F, Umbach DM, Freeman LEB, Koutros S, Alavanja M, et al. High pesticide exposure events and olfactory impairment among U.S. farmers. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(1):17005. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP3713
- Mena F, González-Ortegón E, Solano K, Araújo CVM. The effect of the insecticide diazinon on the osmoregulation and the avoidance response of the white leg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) is salinity dependent. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;206:111364. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111364
- Alarcon WA, Calvert GM, Blondell JM, Mehler LN, Sievert J, Propeck M, et al. Acute illnesses associated with pesticide exposure at schools. JAMA. 2005;294(4):455–65. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.4.455
- Shelton JF, Geraghty EM, Tancredi DJ, Delwiche LD, Schmidt RJ, Ritz B, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(10):1103–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307044
- Larsen AE, Gaines SD, Deschênes O. Agricultural pesticide use and adverse birth outcomes in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00349-2
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment for plant protection products, 2014. Parma, Italy: European Food Safety Authority; 2014. Available from: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3874
- Muñoz-Quezada MT, Lucero B, Bradman A, Steenland K, Zúñiga L, Calafat AM, et al. An educational intervention on the risk perception of pesticides exposure and organophosphate metabolites urinary concentrations in rural school children in Maule Region, Chile. Environ Res. 2019;176:108554. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108554
- Barraza D, Jansen K, van Wendel de Joode B, Wesseling C. Pesticide use in banana and plantain production and risk perception among local actors in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Environ Res. 2011;111(5):708–17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.009
- Vidal P, Solé Gómez M. Riesgo percibido: un procedimiento de evaluación. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales España. NTP. 2001;578.
- The Jamovi Project. Jamovi (Version 2.3). 2022. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org
- Lehrer N, Sneegas G. Beyond polarization: using Q methodology to explore stakeholders’ views on pesticide use, and related risks for agricultural workers, in Washington State’s tree fruit industry. Agric Human Values. 2018;35(1):131–47. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9810-z
- Barraza D, Jansen K, Wesseling C, van Wendel de Joode B. Pesticide risk perceptions among bystanders of aerial spraying on bananas in Costa Rica. Environ Res. 2020;189:109877. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109877
- Subiza-Pérez M, Santa Marina L, Irizar A, Gallastegi M, Anabitarte A, Urbieta N, et al. Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures. Environ Res. 2020;181:108918. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918
- McCright AM, Xiao C. Gender and environmental concern: Insights from recent work and for future research. Soc Nat Resour. 2014;27(10):1109–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.918235
- Calliera M, Luzzani G, Sacchettini G, Capri E. Residents perceptions of non-dietary pesticide exposure risk. Knowledge gaps and challenges for targeted awareness-raising material in Italy. Sci Total Environ. 2019;685:775–85. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.223