Vol. 1 No. 1 (1995)
Research Article

Optimum Radiological Screening Examination for Lumbar Spine

Published 2020-12-01

Keywords

  • radiology,
  • lumbar spine

How to Cite

1.
Etemad-Rezai R, V. Fenton P. Optimum Radiological Screening Examination for Lumbar Spine. McGill J Med [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1 [cited 2025 Oct. 6];1(1). Available from: https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/401

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to assess the diagnostic contribution of oblique view films of the lumbar spine, to information obtained from anteroposterior (AP) and lateral films, as an initial screening tool for the detection of pars interarticularis defects. Twenty-two cases of lumbar spondylolysis were selected from 243 lumbar spine reports, randomly combined with 40 plain X-rays of normal lumbar spines, and evaluated by radiology residents. The frequency of correctly detecting a pars defect on lateral vs. right and left oblique views was determined. Of the bilateral spondylolyses, 85% were diagnosed on lateral films compared to 35% on oblique radiographs. Both views gave poor diagnostic yield in detecting unilateral pars defects. In evaluating a total of 186 X-rays, an average of 31 oblique films were incorrectly diagnosed, as compared to an average of 14 misdiagnosed lateral films. Considering the low sensitivity associated with the use of oblique view radiography, in addition to the extra cost and significantly increased radiation exposure seen with this procedure, our findings indicate that oblique views should be used only for selected patients who might require further investigation. We therefore recommend that the initial lumbosacral radiological evaluation be limited to AP and lateral views.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Giles L. Anatomical basis of low back pain. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989:1.
  2. Roberts F, Kishore P, Cunningham M. Routine oblique radiography of the pediatric lumbar spine: is it necessary? American Journal of Roentgenology 1978;131:297-298.
  3. Gehweiler J, Daffner R. Low back pain: the controversy of radiologic evaluation. American Journal of Roentgenology 1982;140:109-112.
  4. Scavone J, Latshaw R, Weidner W. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination. American Journal of Roentgenology 1981;136:715-717.
  5. Eisenberg R, Hedgehock M, William E, et al. Optimum radiologic examination for consideration of compensation awards: cervical and lumbar spines. American Journal of Roentgenology 1980;135:1071-1074.
  6. Lisbon E, Bloom R, Dinari G. Oblique lumbar spine radiographs: importance in young patients. Radiology 1984;151:89-90.
  7. Hardy RW. Lumbar Disk Disease, 2nd edition. New York: Raven Press, Ltd., 1993;35,213.
  8. Cope R. Acute traumatic spondylolysis: report of a case and literature review. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 1988;230:162-165.