Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Reflections

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023)

Healthcare in Her Shoes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v21i1.968
Submitted
February 25, 2022
Published
2022-10-11

Abstract

Subjects within the realm of a woman’s reproductive health have been greatly debated for decades and the controversy that surrounds them does not appear to be dissipating any time soon. Thousands of articles are published annually on the topics of abortion, female sterilization, their associated ethical dilemmas, and the disparities that women face in the healthcare system. Although we have made great strides in creating an equitable healthcare system, there are still changes to be made. I would argue that women face a disproportional degree of stigmatization, bias, and unethical policy when it comes to their reproductive healthcare, and my aim is to highlight some realistic examples of what this may look like. Broadcasting these issues and encouraging others to think about them allows disparities to be more greatly recognized and thus better able to be dismantled.

References

  1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [Internet]. Washington (USA): ACOG Clinical; [date unknown]. Sterilization of Women; 2017 April [cited 2022 Feb 11]. Available from: tinyurl.com/3p9mktxk
  2. Simonaitis J. Spouse’s Consent to Sterilization. JAMA [Internet]. 1974 Jun [cited 2022 Feb 11];228(11):1453. Available from PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12257282/
  3. Black A, Guilbert E. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4). J Obst Gyne Cad [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited 2022 Feb 11]; 37(11):1033-1035. Available from: https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(16)30054-8/pdf
  4. Schmidt J, Hillis S, Marchbanks P, Jeng G, Peterson H. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal Sterility [Internet]. Fert Ster [Internet]. 2000 Nov [cited 2022 Feb 11];74(5)892-898. Available from PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11056229/
  5. Human Life Protection Act 2019 (AL) s 4-10.
  6. Robinson v Marshall (2019) 68 F.3d 1.
  7. Thomson Reuters Foundation News [Internet]. London (UK): Thomson Reuters Foundation News; c2020. U.S. states making 2021 moves on abortion rights and access; 2021 Oct 07 [cited 2022 Feb 11]; [about 5 screens]. Available from: https://news.trust.org/item/20201231112641-qfynt/
  8. Advance Local Media [Internet]. Alabama (USA): Alabama Local News; c1996. Abortion ban to be decided by 31 men, 3 women; 2019 May 14 [cited 2022 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.al.com/politics/2019/05/abortion-ban-to-be-decided-by-31-men-3-women.html

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.