Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Commentary

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2022): New Horizons: Innovation in Medicine

Rewarding progress: Effective learning strategies through a variable ratio incentive-based approach in medical education

DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v20i2.914
Submitted
June 22, 2021
Published
2022-04-19

Abstract

Medical students are faced with many unprecedented challenges, one of which is the large amount of material they are required to learn and retain. While effective learning strategies have been thoroughly researched, stress levels amongst medical students remain very high due to perceived failure to retain material, suggesting that novel methods of implementing such existing strategies are required. Aside from stress levels, additional challenges in medical education include the incorporation of inconsistent testing methods and the challenge of accommodating different learning styles and preferences. A more evidence-based approach that aims to cover many learning styles at once may be desirable. The aim of this commentary is to present some of the current learning and teaching strategies utilized within medical education across the world and to promote a novel supplementary approach to medical education involving a variable ratio incentive-based system of active recall and spaced repetition. This system aims to reward small achievements throughout the semester and complements formal structured examinations in order to motivate students. While this model has yet to be tested, we hope to motivate medical faculty to pilot a program with these evidence-based strategies in mind.

References

  1. Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. Flexner Revisited: The Role and Value of the Basic Sciences in Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(2):349-355. doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181c88b09
  2. Leggat PA. Traditional and innovative approaches to medical education in Australia and the move to graduate schools. Medical Teacher. 1997;19(2):93-94. doi:10.3109/01421599709019358
  3. Schwartzstein RM, Roberts DH. Saying Goodbye to Lectures in Medical School — Paradigm Shift or Passing Fad? New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(7):605-607. doi:10.1056/nejmp1706474
  4. Premkumar K, Pahwa P, Banerjee A, Baptiste K, Bhatt H, Lim HJ. Does Medical Training Promote or Deter Self-Directed Learning? A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study. Academic Medicine. 2013;88(11):1754-1764. doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182a9262d
  5. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Iii HLR. Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention. Medical Education. 2013;47(7):674-682. doi:10.1111/medu.12141
  6. Mullangi S, Jagsi R. Imposter Syndrome: Treat the Cause, Not the Symptom. JAMA. 2019;322(5):403-404. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.9788
  7. Fares J, Al Tabosh H, Saadeddin Z, El Mouhayyar C, Aridi H. Stress, Burnout and Coping Strategies in Preclinical Medical Students. N Am J Med Sci. 2016;8(2):75-81. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.177299
  8. Puthran, R., Zhang, M., Tam, W., Ho, R., 2021. Prevalence of depression amongst medical students: a meta-analysis.
  9. Mojtabai, R., Olfson, M., Han, B., 2016. National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults. PEDIATRICS, 138(6), pp.e20161878-e20161878.
  10. Bergmann C, Muth T, Loerbroks A. Medical students’ perceptions of stress due to academic studies and its interrelationships with other domains of life: a qualitative study. Medical Education Online. 2019;24(1):1603526. doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1603526
  11. Fawzy M, Hamed SA. Prevalence of psychological stress, depression and anxiety among medical students in Egypt. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:186-194. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.027
  12. Patel RS, Bachu R, Adikey A, Malik M, Shah M. Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review. Behav Sci (Basel). 2018;8(11):98. Published 2018 Oct 25. doi:10.3390/bs8110098
  13. Jafari N, Loghmani A, Montazeri A. Mental health of Medical Students in Different Levels of Training. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(Suppl 1):S107-S112.
  14. Assessment methods in medical education. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2008;2(2):3-7
  15. Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence. Med Educ. 1985;19(3):238-247. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01314.x
  16. Vyas R, Supe A. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options. Natl Med J India. 2008;21(3):130-133.
  17. Hift RJ. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:249. Published 2014 Nov 28. doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2
  18. Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance [published correction appears in Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Nov 18;:]. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(6):308-313. doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0220-x
  19. Radcliffe C, Lester H. Perceived stress during undergraduate medical training: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2003;37(1):32-38. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01405.x
  20. Sleight DA, Mavis BE. Study Skills and Academic Performance among Second-Year Medical Students in Problem-Based Learning. Med Educ Online. 2006;11(1):4599. doi:10.3402/meo.v11i.4599
  21. Hirshbein LD, Gay T. Case-based independent study for medical students in emergency psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2005;29(1):96-99. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.96
  22. Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M, Hege I, Holzer M, Fischer MR. Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ. 2011;45(11):1101-1110. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04043.x
  23. Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular Change in medical schools: how to succeed. Academic Medicine. 2000;75(6):575-594. doi:10.1097/00001888-200006000-00006
  24. Augustin M. How to learn effectively in medical school: test yourself, learn actively, and repeat in intervals. Yale J Biol Med. 2014;87(2):207-212. Published 2014 Jun 6.
  25. Hauswirth M., Adamoli A. Identifying Misconceptions with Active Recall in a Blended Learning System. Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2017;10474(EC-TEL 2017):416-421. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_36
  26. Vance DE, Farr KF. Spaced Retrieval for enhancing memory: implications for nursing practice and research. J Gerontol Nurs. 2007;33(9):46-52. doi:10.3928/00989134-20070901-08
  27. Ausubel DP, Youssef M. The effect of spaced repetition on meaningful retention. J Gen Psychol. 1965;73:147-150. doi:10.1080/00221309.1965.9711263
  28. Comer RJ, Ogden N, Boyes M, Gould E. Chapter 7: Learning. In: Psychology around Us. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2018:269-275.
  29. Berger, C.J., Cummings, L.L., & Hene-man, H.G., III. (1975). Expectancy theory and operant conditioning predictions of performance under variable ratio and continuous sched-ules of reinforcement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 227-243
  30. Elmes D. Anki—powerful, intelligent flashcards. 2015. http://ankisrs.net/.
  31. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):678-688. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04284.x

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.