Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Article

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2018)

A comparative cadaveric biomechanical analysis of the differences between dynamic external traction devices for PIP joint fracture dislocation.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v16i1.89
Submitted
July 9, 2017
Published
2018-07-06

Abstract

Purpose: No study in the literature compares different external distractors for PIPJ injury. We compared a device described by Suzuki et al and another by Hynes & Giddins in non-injured cadaveric fingers. Main outcome measures were articular space and PIPJ flexion resistance.

Methods: Thirty-two Thiel embalmed fingers were used. The elastics based model was performed with 3 and 5 elastics per side (3E and 5E); the 2-pin model used no elastics (2P). Articular distraction of each device was measured using x-ray imaging. The force required to flex the PIP joint to 45˚ and 90˚ in each group was measured with a dynamometer.

Main findings: The articular distraction was statistically significant for all groups. The difference in articular distraction was significant in the AP view between groups 3E and 2P, and 5E and 2P. Flexion forces were only significant between group 5E and 2P at 90˚ flexion, but resistance was notably higher in group 2P than in groups 3E and 5E. Group 2P was more difficult to engage and often disengaged in flexion compared to groups 3E and 5E.

Conclusion: All devices achieved significant articular distraction (>99% in AP) but optimal distraction has not been clinically determined and may depend on each unique fracture, hence a variable distraction device may be optimal. The 3E and 5E models can be adjusted for distraction by adding the sufficient elastics to reduce individual fractures. The increased resistance to PIP flexion found in the 2P model may limit post-op mobilization, but clinical correlation is needed. 

References

  1. Larsen, C., et al., The epidemiology of hand injuries in The Netherlands and Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol., 2004(19): p. 323-7.
  2. Angermann P, L.M., Injuries to the hand and wrist. A study of 50,272 injuries. J Hand Surg Br., 1993(18): p. 642-4.
  3. McElfresh, E., J. Dobyns, and E. O’Brien, Management of fracture- dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joints by extension block splinting. J Bone Joint Surg Am., 1972(54): p. 1705-1711.
  4. Twyman, R. and H. David, The door stop procedure. A technique for treating unstable fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am., 1993(18): p. 714-715.
  5. Stern , P., M. Wieser, and D. Reilly, Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. . Clin Orthop Relat Res. , 1987(214): p. 59-65.
  6. Deitch, M., et al., Dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint: Surgical complications and long-term results. . J Hand Surg., 1999(24): p. 914-923.
  7. Freeland, A. and L. Benoist, Open reduction and internal fixation method for fractures at the proximal interphalangeal joint. . Hand Clin., 1994(10): p. 239–250.
  8. Green, A., et al., Acute open reduction and rigid internal fixation of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocation. J Hand Surg. , 1992(17): p. 512-517.
  9. Wolfe, S. and L. Katz, Intra-articular impaction fractures of the phalanges. . J Hand Surg., 1995(20): p. 327–333.
  10. Durham-Smith, G. and G. McCarten, Volar plate arthroplasty for closed proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. J Hand Surg., 1992(17): p. 422–428.
  11. Malerich, M. and R. Eaton, The volar plate reconstruction for fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin., 1994(10): p. 251–260.
  12. Stark, R., Treatment of difficult pip joint fractures with a mini-external fixation device. . Orthop Rev., 1993(22): p. 609– 615.
  13. Morgan, J., et al., Dynamic digital traction for unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg. , 1995(20): p. 565–573.
  14. Robertson, R., J. Cawley, and A. Faris, Treatment of fracture- dislocation of the interphalangeal joints of the hand. . J Bone Joint Surg., 1946(28): p. 68-70.
  15. Schenck, R., The dynamic traction method. Combining movement and traction for intra-articular fractures of the phalanges. Hand Clin., 1994(10): p. 187–198.
  16. Stassen, L., et al., Dynamic circle traction for severely comminuted intra-articular finger fractures. Injury, 1994(25): p. 159 –163.
  17. Deshmukh, S., et al., Complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand. Results of a modified pins and rubbers traction system. J Bone Joint Surg., 2004(86): p. 406-412.
  18. Duteille, F., et al., Treatment of complex interphalangeal joint fractures with dynamic external traction: A series of 20 cases. . Plast Reconstr Surg., 2003(111): p. 1623-1629.
  19. Fahmy, N., N. Kenny, and N. Kehoe, Chronic fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Treatment by the “s” quattro. J Hand Surg., 1994(19): p. 783-787.
  20. Fahmy NR, The stockport serpentine spring system for the treatment of displaced comminuted intra-articular phalangeal fractures. . J Hand Surg., 1990(15): p. 301-311.
  21. Gaul, J.J. and S. Rosenberg, Fracture-dislocation of the middle phalanx at the proximal interphalangeal joint: Repair with a simple intradigital traction-fixation device. Am J Orthop., 1998(27): p. 682–688.
  22. Inanami, H., et al., Dynamic external finger fixator for fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. . J Hand Surg. , (18): p. 160-164.
  23. Krakauer, J.D. and P.J. Stern, Hinged device for fractures involving the proximal interphalangeal joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 1996(327): p. 29-37.
  24. Suzuki Y., et al., The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures and fracture-dislocations in the hand. J Hand Surg., 1994(19B): p. 98-107.
  25. Syed, A., M. Agarwal, and B. R., Dynamic external fixator for pilon fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints: A simple fixator for a complex fracture. J Hand Surg. , 2003(28): p. 137–141.
  26. Hynes, M.C. and G.E. Giddins, Dynamic external fixation for pilon fractures of the interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Br., 2001. 26(2): p. 122-4.
  27. O'Brien, L.J., et al., Swing traction versus no-traction for complex intra-articular proximal inter-phalangeal fractures. J Hand Ther., 2014. 27(4): p. 309-16.
  28. Ruland, R.T., et al., Use of dynamic distraction external fixation for unstable fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am., 2008. 33(1): p. 19-25.
  29. Kneser, U., et al., Biomechanical and functional analysis of the pins and rubbers tractions system for treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg., 2009. 129(1): p. 29-37.
  30. Keramidas, E., et al., The Suzuki frame for complex intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fingers. Ann Plast Surg., 2007. 58(5): p. 484-8.
  31. Ellis, S.J., et al., Treatment of proximal interphalangeal dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries with dynamic external fixation: a pins and rubber band system. J Hand Surg Am., 2007. 32(8): p. 1242-50.
  32. Skoff, H.D., A proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocation treated by limited open (percutaneous) reduction and dynamic external fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg., 1997. 99(2): p. 587-9.
  33. Rawes, M.L. and O.O. Oni, Swan-neck deformity as a complication of the Agee technique. J Hand Surg Br., 1995. 20(2): p. 255-7.
  34. Nam, S.M., et al., Interphalangeal traction for comminuted fracture of middle phalanx fingers: case report. J Hand Surg Am., 2010. 35(8): p. 1282-5.
  35. Keramidas, E.G. and G. Miller, The Suzuki frame for complex intraarticular fractures of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg., 2005. 116(5): p. 1326-31.
  36. Allison, D.M., Fractures of the base of the middle phalanx treated by a dynamic external fixation device. J Hand Surg Br., 1996. 21(3): p. 305-10.
  37. Johnson, D., et al., Dynamic external fixation for complex intraarticular phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Br., 2004. 29(1): p. 76-81.
  38. King, W.K., et al., Evaluation of a pediatric-sedation service for common diagnostic procedures. Acad Emerg Med, 2006. 13(6): p. 673-6.
  39. Theivendran, K., J. Pollock, and V. Rajaratnam, Proximal interphalangeal joint fractures of the hand: treatment with an external dynamic traction device. Ann Plast Surg., 2007. 58(6): p. 625-9.
  40. Cheema, M., et al., A biomechanical analysis of distraction force in modified hynes-Giddins dynamic external fixator. Ann Plast Surg., 2007. 59(3): p. 300-1.
  41. Borgohain, B., N. Borgohain, and P. Tittal, Double parabolic Kirschner-wires as dynamic distractor for treatment of unstable intraarticular phalangeal fractures of hand. Indian J Orthop, 2012. 46(6): p. 680-4.
  42. Badia, A., et al., Dynamic intradigital external fixation for proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations. J Hand Surg Am., 2005. 30(1): p. 154-60.
  43. Suzuki, Y., et al., The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures and fracture-dislocations in the hand.[Erratum appears in J Hand Surg [Br] 1994 Jun;19(3):408]. Journal of Hand Surgery - British Volume, 1994. 19(1): p. 98-107.
  44. Thomas, L., et al., Injuries of the hand. Review of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2001, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
  45. Stern PJ., et al., Pilon fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am., 1991(16): p. 844-850.
  46. Salter, R., The physiologic basis of continuous passive motion for articular cartilage healing and regeneration. Hand Clin., 1994(10): p. 211-219.
  47. Bain, G.I., et al., Dynamic external fixation for injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 1998. 80(6): p. 1014-9.
  48. Debus, G., et al., Pins and rubber traction system for intra-articular proximal interphalangeal joint fractures revisited. J Hand Surg Eur Vol., 2010. 35(5): p. 396-401.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.