Vol. 7 No. 2 (2004)
Reflections

Legal Parameters to Medical, Ethical and Professional Responsibilities: Are Doctors Appropriately Categorised as Fiduciaries

PDF
  • Scott Guy,
  • Barbara Hocking,
  • Stewart Muirhead
Scott Guy
Queensland University of Technology
Bio
Barbara Hocking
Faculty of Law of Queensland University of Technology
Bio
Stewart Muirhead
Queensland University of Technology
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v7i2.782

Published 2020-12-01

Keywords

  • Legal,
  • Ethics,
  • medical negligence

How to Cite

1.
Guy S, Hocking B, Muirhead S. Legal Parameters to Medical, Ethical and Professional Responsibilities: Are Doctors Appropriately Categorised as Fiduciaries. McGill J Med [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1 [cited 2025 Oct. 16];7(2). Available from: https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/782
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

N/A

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Chief Justice Paul de Jersey "Recent Developments in Australian Negligence Law: Implications for the Insurance Industry", Insurance Council of Australia State Conference, Sheraton Hotel, Brisbane, May 23, 2003, 5. De Jersey notes the "increasingly plaintiff-friendly state in which negligence law is finding itself". His Honour points to the resultant 22 percent rise in insurance premiums in the 2001-2002 financial year: de Jersey, Insurance Council of Australia State Conference, Sheraton Hotel, Brisbane, May 23, 2003, 5. He supports the recommendations in the Federal Government's so-called "Ipp Report" which calls for a tightening of the law of negligence, in favour of defendants and away from plaintiffs.
  3. (1999) NTSC 127.
  4. Sidaway -v- Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors, per Lord Scarman, (1985) 1 AC 871.
  5. Norberg -v- Wynrib (1992) DLR 4th 449 per McLachlin J.
  6. See Dorsett, S., 'Aspassin v The Queen in Right of Canada: Re-examining the Source of the Crown's Fiduciary Obligation to Indigenous Peoples' Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 78: 7, 1996.
  7. Breen -v- Williams (1995-1996) per Dawson and Toohey JJ.
  8. Breen -v- Williams (1995-1996) HCA 186 CLR 71 at 89.
  9. Breen -v- Williams (1995-1996) HCA 186 CLR 71 at 89.
  10. See Mabo -v- Queensland (No 2)(1992) 175 CLR 1 at 203. See also the imposition of a fiduciary duty in cases of mistaken payment of money: Chase Manhattan Bank -v- Israel-British Bank (1981) 1 CH 105.
  11. Sidaway -v- Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) 1 AC 871 per Lord Scarman.
  12. Breen -v- Williams (1995-1996) HCA 186 CLR 71 per Gummow J.
  13. This was considered by the final report of the Taskforce on Sexual Abuse of Patients (25 November 1991) p11.
  14. Paul Michalik, "Doctors' Fiduciary Duties" , Journal of Law and Medicine, 6: 172; 1998.
  15. Breen -v- Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71 per Brennan CJ at p82. 15. Frame -v- Smith (187) 42 DLR(4th) 81 at 104, per Wilson. J, and other non-pecuniary interests. 16. Re Gibson 369 NW 2d 466 (1985). Vol.7 No.2
  16. Re Gibson 369 NW 2d 466 at 476 (1985).
  17. Norberg -v- Wynrib (1992) 92 DLR (4th) 449 at 499.
  18. Norberg -v- Wynrib (1992) 92 DLR (4th) 449 at 499. In Canada, the law of fiduciary duties is more highly developed in the area of indigenous rights.
  19. Norberg v. Wynrib (1992) 92 DLR (4th) 449 at 499.
  20. (1999) NTSC 127.
  21. Rogers -v- Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR per Mason CJ.
  22. Sidaway -v- Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) AC 877 at 893, per Lord Diplock.
  23. Gover -v- South Australia (1985) 39 SASR 543, at 551.
  24. Bolam -v- Friern Hopsital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582 at 586.
  25. Molam -v- Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582 at 586.
  26. Canterbury -v- Spence (18) (1972) 464 F2d 772.
  27. Reibl -v- Hughes (3) (1980) 114 DLR (3d) at 13.
  28. (1992) 175 CLR 479.
  29. Naxakis -v- Western General Hospital (1999) HCA 22; see also Rosenberg -v- Percival (2001) HCA 18 (5 April 2001).
  30. Barbara Hocking and Stewart Muirhead "Warning, Warning, Warning - All Doctors!", PN, 16: 31; 2000.
  31. Edward Wong Finance Co Limited -v- Johnson, Stokes & Masters (1984) AC 296.
  32. (1999) NTSC 127.
  33. See Tan -v- Benkovic (2000) NSWCA 295 .
  34. (2000) NSWCA 295.
  35. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [31].
  36. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [12].
  37. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [6].
  38. This test was also adopted in Droga v. Coluzzi (2000) NSWCA 1081; Blackwell v. AAA (1997) 1 VR 182 and Grincelis -v-
  39. House (2000) 201 CLR 321.
  40. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [7].
  41. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [47].
  42. (2000) NSWCA 295 at para. [31].
  43. (2000) 51 NSWLR 268.
  44. (2003) NSWSC 754.
  45. See Jones, M "Fault, Negligence and the Standard of Care: A Conceptual Enquiry into Medical Critiques of Medical
  46. Litigation", Journal of Law and Medicine, (8): 68; 1999. 46. Jones M: "Liability for Psychiatric Patients: Setting the Boundaries", PN, 16: 45; 2000.
  47. (1999) 3 WLR 873 per Lord Hoffman.