Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Article

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2009)

Retrospective review of two-port thoracoscopic (VATS) wedge bullectomy and lung wedge biopsy

  • Jimmy Bejjani
  • Guillaume Couture
  • Juan-Francisco Asenjo
  • Marco Sirois
  • Chantal Sirois
  • Christian Sirois
November 12, 2020


Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) involving wedge resection of bulla and lung biopsy can be done by two or three-port incisions. Controversy exists as to which approach is superior. We communicate our experience with two-port VATS for these procedures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of all patients who underwent a VATS procedure by two-port incisions from July 2001 to July 2007 by two thoracic surgeons (S.C., S.C.) We included in the study all patients who underwent wedge resections for primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax and biopsies for pulmonary infiltrates and small nodules. Results: A total of 319 patients’ charts were examined, and 217 of whom had undergone two-port incisions fitted in the inclusion criteria. There were 136 (65.7%) males and 81 (37.3%) females with a mean age of 47 years. Pneumothorax was the main diagnosis for 98 (45%) patients, followed by pulmonary infiltrates for 69 (32%) patients and lung nodules for 50 (23%) patients. The mean operative time and the number of post-op days for chest tube removal and to discharge home in each group have also been recorded. There were few post-operative complications, such as 11 (5%) cases of persistent air leak, 11 (5%) cases of transient fever of unknown origin, 3 (1.4%) cases of pneumonia, 3 (1.4%) cases of bleeding within, one reoperated, and 1 (0.46%) case of C. difficile colitis. The 30-day mortality was 0%. Conclusion: The thoracoscopic (VATS) wedge biopsy via two-port incisions is a safe operation for patients presenting with pneumothorax or requiring a lung biopsy. A two-port approach seems to be a reasonable alternative to three-port incision procedures for these types of diagnosis, regarding post-operative pain and cosmetic benefits particularly for young patients.


  1. Cancer Facts and Figures, American Cancer Society, 2008.
  2. Gupta D, Hansell A, Nichols T, et al. Epidemiology of pneumothorax in England. Thorax. 2000; 55: 666-71.
  3. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008; 7: 63-6.
  4. Tagaya N, Kasama K, Suzuki N et al. Video-assisted bullectomy using needlescopic instruments for spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2003;17: 1486-7.
  5. Zaraca F, Ebner H. Video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial lung disease. Chir Ital. 2006; 58: 569-76.
  6. Murasugi M, Onuki T, Ikeda T, et al. The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of the small peripheral pulmonary nodule. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 734-6.
  7. Chou SH, Cheng YJ, Kao EL. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery indicated in the first episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2: 552-4.
  8. Lang-Lazdunski L, Chapuis O, Bonnet PM, et al. Videothoracoscopic bleb excision and pleural abrasion for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 960-5.
  9. Lee JM, Lee YC, Huang CJ, et al. The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of indeterminate pulmonary lesion. Int Surg 1996; 81:327-9.
  10. Czerny M, Salat A, Fleck T, et al. Lung wedge resection improves outcome in stage I primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77:1802-5.
  11. Ayed AK, Al-Shawaf E. A survey of 150 video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2004 May-Jun;13(3):159-63
  12. Celik M, Halezeroglu S, Senol C, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: experience with 341 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998; 14: 113-6.
  13. Passlick B, Born C, Haussinger K, et al. Efficiency of video- assisted thoracic surgery for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 324-7.
  14. Inderbitzi RG, Leiser A, Furrer M, et al. Three years' experience in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:1410-5.
  15. Jiménez MF; Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Study Group. Prospective study on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the resection of pulmonary nodules: 209 cases from the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Study Group. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001; 19: 562-5.
  16. Ingolfsson I, Gyllstedt E, Lillo-Gil R, et al. Reoperations are common following VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax: study of risk factors. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006; 5: 602-7.
  17. de Vos B, Hendriks J, Van Schil P, Van Hee R, et al. Long-term results after video-assisted thoracic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. Acta Chir Belg 2002; 102: 439-44.
  18. Waller DA. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax-a 7-year learning experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999; 81: 387-92.
  19. Chen JS, Hsu HH, Kuo SW, et al. Needlescopic versus conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a comparative study Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1080-5
  20. Horio H, Nomori H, Kobayashi R, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Impact of additional pleurodesis in video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 630-4.


Download data is not yet available.