Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Narrative Review

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2004)

The Vegetative State: A Review of Etiology and Prognostic Factors

  • Rachel Elizabeth Davison
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v7i2.397
Submitted
October 27, 2020
Published
2020-12-01

Abstract

This paper reviews the research investigating the vegetative state (VS) in terms of its aetiology and prognostic factors that may be indicative of the outcome for patients in the VS. The VS is a relatively rare syndrome that still causes confusion for treating clinicians. In short, the VS is a clinical condition of unawareness of self and environment but with retained wakefulness. Until relatively recently there were no universally accepted diagnostic criteria, which caused problems both in terms of diagnosing the patient and in determining the incidence of the VS. This paper examines the most relevant and up to date work in order to determine if there is a way of predicting whether the VS for any given patient will be persistent (i.e. recovery is still possible) or if it is permanent and further treatment is futile. Currently, the most accurately available method to predict the prognosis of a patient in the VS is through clinical assessment of the patient combined with knowledge of the aetiology and duration of the VS. More work is needed in order to allow for the prediction of the outcome of the VS with greater certainty.

References

  1. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. The Lancet 1:734-7; 1972
  2. Bates D. The prognosis of medical coma. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 71(Suppl 1):120-3; 2001
  3. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. New England Journal of Medicine 330(21):1499-1508; 1994a
  4. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. New England Journal of Medicine 330(22):1572-9; 1994b
  5. Zeman A. Persistent vegetative state. The Lancet 350(9080):795-9; 1997
  6. Working Group of the Royal College of Physicians. The permanent vegetative state. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 30(2):119-121; 1996
  7. International Working Party Report on the vegetative state. Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability: London, 1996
  8. Ashwal S, et al. The persistent vegetative state in children: Report of the Child Neurology Society Ethics Committee. Annals of Neurology 32(4):570-6; 1992
  9. Kampfl A, et al. Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. The Lancet 351(9118):1763-7; 1998
  10. Shewmon D. Coma prognosis in children: Part II: Clinical application. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17(5):467- 472; 2000
  11. Levy D, et al. Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. Annals of Internal Medicine 94(3):293-301; 1981
  12. Andrews K. Recovery of patients after four months or more in the persistent vegetative state. British Medical Journal 306(6892):1597-600; 1993
  13. Dubroja I, et al. Outcome of post-traumatic unawareness persisting for more than a month. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 58(4):465-6; 1995
  14. Zanderbergen E, et al. Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma. The Lancet 352(9143):1808-12; 1998
  15. Hamel M, et al. Identification of comatose patients at high risk for death or severe disability. Journal of the American Medical Association 273(23):1842-8; 1995
  16. Wardlow J, Easton V, Statham P. Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 72:188-192; 2002
  17. Oder W, et al. HM-PAO-SPECT in persistent vegetative state after head injury: prognostic indicator of the likelihood of recovery? Intensive Care Medicine 17(3):149-53; 1991
  18. Sleigh J, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury: a blinded study. Journal of Neurosurgery 91(4):577-80; 1999
  19. Chen R, Bolton C, Young B. Prediction of outcome in patients with anoxic coma: a clinical and electrophysiologic study. Critical Care Medicine 24(4):672-8; 1996
  20. Yingling C, Hosobuchi Y, Harrington M. P300 as a predictor of recovery from coma. The Lancet 336(8719):873; 1990
  21. Sorbi S, et al. ApoE as a prognostic factor for post-traumatic coma. Nature Medicine 1(9):852; 1995

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.