Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026)
Commentary

Using Gamification to Improve Medical Student Education: An Emphasis on Anatomy, Pathology, and Pharmacology

Nabeel Abu-Mahfouz
University of Guelph

Published 2026-10-15

Keywords

  • Gamification,
  • Medical Education,
  • Anatomy,
  • Pathology,
  • Pharmacology

How to Cite

1.
Abu-Mahfouz N. Using Gamification to Improve Medical Student Education: An Emphasis on Anatomy, Pathology, and Pharmacology. McGill J Med [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 15 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];23(1). Available from: https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/1159

Abstract

Traditionally, medical training utilized rote memorization strategies, didactic lectures, and dissections of cadaveric donors to convey information. As significant as these traditional methodologies have been in shaping medical training, they often fail to maintain student engagement and do not always foster the deep conceptual understanding necessary for clinical proficiency. Given the high cognitive loads experienced by medical students, new methodologies that maximize motivation, recall, and hands-on practice are increasingly researched. Gamification, defined as the integration of game elements such as points, levels, rewards, leaderboards, and interactive simulations, has gained traction as an effective educational tool.

This article addresses the use of gamification in medical education, namely in pathology, anatomy, and pharmacology. Empirical studies are utilized to examine how educational tools with a gamified format enhance motivation, problem-solving, and the application of information. Key advantages include increased student engagement, improved recall, and a more interactive approach to medical training. However, challenges such as cognitive overload, varied student preferences, and resource constraints are also analyzed. By evaluating the effectiveness and limitations of gamification, this paper contributes to a growing discourse on innovative educational strategies that can improve medical training, with the goal of better preparing students for clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443-451. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000134
  2. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE. 2014;3025-34. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  3. Aker S, Şahin MK. The relationship between school burnout, sense of school belonging and academic achievement in preclinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022;27(4):949-63. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10121-x
  4. Subhash S, Cudney EA. Gamified learning in higher education: a systematic review of the literature. Comput Human Behav. 2018;87:192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028
  5. Wang R, DeMaria S, Goldberg A, Katz D. A systematic review of serious games in training health care professionals. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):41-51. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000118
  6. Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: a review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 5;103(27):e38813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
  7. Nicholson DT, Chalk C, Funnell WRJ, Daniel SJ. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ. 2006;40(11):1081-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02611.x
  8. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549-59. doi: 10.1002/ase.1696
  9. Neureiter D, Klieser E, Neumayer B, Winkelmann P, Urbas R, Kiesslich T. Feasibility of Kahoot! as a real-time assessment tool in (histo-)pathology classroom teaching. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:695-705. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S264821
  10. Shrivastava SR, Bobhate PS, Petkar PB, Tiwade YR, Badge AK. Facilitating seamless integration of game-based assessments in medical education. Contemp Clin Dent. 2024;15(3):217-9. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_33_24
  11. Tsang HC, Truong J, Morse RJ, Hasan RA, Lieberman JA. The transfusion service laboratory in virtual reality. Transfusion. 2022;62(3):713-5. doi: 10.1111/trf.16799
  12. Hope DL, Grant GD, Rogers GD, King MA. Gamification in pharmacy education: a systematic quantitative literature review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2023;31(1):15-31. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riac099
  13. Oestreich JH, Guy JW. Game-based learning in pharmacy education. Pharmacy (Basel). 2022;10(1):11. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010011
  14. De-Marcos L, Domínguez A, Saenz-de-Navarrete J, Pagés C. An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Comput Educ. 2014;75:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.012
  15. Lester D, Skulmoski GJ, Fisher DP, Mehrotra V, Lim I, Lang A, et al. Drivers and barriers to the utilisation of gamification and game‐based learning in universities: a systematic review of educators’ perspectives. Br J Educ Technol. 2023;54(6):1748-70. doi:10.1111/bjet.13351
  16. Tabassum A. Challenges of implementing gamification in medical education: a scoping review. J Bahria Univ Med Dent Coll. 2024;14(02):155-60. doi: 10.51985/JBUMDC2023260